Google Plus Business   Pinterest

800.ELLIMAN

Teachers May Avoid Being Laid Off By Stopping Raises

I read on NY1 today that Bloomberg ruled that to halt 4,400 teachers from being laid off, he froze salaries for two years. The Teacher's Union claims he does not have the power to do that. The school chancellor, Joe Klein, stated that since the teacher contract already expired, Bloomberg had every right to enforce the salary freeze.

Now there will be a battle between who is right and who is wrong.

Even if the salary of many teachers are frozen, over 2,000 teachers are still going to lose their jobs.

You can read the entire store:

http://www.ny1.com/content/top_stories/119675/city-to-avoid-teacher-layoffs-by-halting-raises
Question asked via StreetAdvisor The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Douglas Elliman.
2 people following
this discussion
Report

3 Comments

It seems like the result is the worst of all possible worlds. I understand that having one's salary frozen isn't ideal - but surely it's better than layoffs!
Report
The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Douglas Elliman.
hhusted 2yrs+
@Ajadedidealist: I agree to a degree. The problem with freezing wages is the cost of living goes up. So if the teachers work off a certain salary and they have a budget in place, making the same wage two years in a roll would might impact that budget, especially if everything else goes up. Do you understand what I mean? In other words, if their wages stay the same, but the cost of using gas/electric goes up, along with their phone or cable, and anything else they use, this would create a situation. So although I agree that freezing wages would help keep them from getting laid off, in the long run it wouldn't help, because it would put them in a financial or near financial crisis.

Of course, I am only assuming here. I may be wrong entirely. It really depends as to how teachers handle their finances as compared to later.
Report
The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Douglas Elliman.
That makes sense, @hhusted - of course it does. But losing one's entire salary is still a worse option, overall, and I can see why cutting jobs is an issue. Then again, there's the issue of incompetent teachers being unable to be fired (see: rubber rooms)
Report
The opinions expressed here are those of the individual and not those of Douglas Elliman.

Add a comment

All data is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed accurate by the RLS or Douglas Elliman. See Terms of Service for additional restrictions.

All information regarding a property for sale, rental, taxes or financing is from sources deemed reliable. No representation is made as to the accuracy thereof, and such information is subject to errors, omission, change of price, rental, commission, prior sale, lease or financing, or withdrawal without notice. All square footage and dimensions are approximate. Exact dimensions can be obtained by retaining the services of a professional architect or engineer.

The number of bedrooms listed above is not a legal conclusion. Each person should consult with his/her own attorney, architect or zoning expert to make a determination as to the number of rooms in the unit that may be legally used as a bedroom.

© 2014. Douglas Elliman Real Estate. All material presented herein is intended for information purposes only. While, this information is believed to be correct, it is represented subject to errors, omissions, changes or withdrawal without notice. All property information, including, but not limited to square footage, room count, number of bedrooms and the school district in property listings are deemed reliable, but should be verified by your own attorney, architect or zoning expert. Equal Housing Opportunity.